Does Media Training Need a Face Lift?

I was chatting with a national newspaper reporter this week and a familiar topic came up. “I hate it,” she told me, “when people keep answering with the same phrase, no matter what question I ask of them.”

We were talking, of course, about media training. I had confessed to moving to the dark side after years of being a print and broadcast journalist. Her complaint was well-founded and I believe it reflects what public relations people have been saying for years. Stick to your key message is the refrain and I’ve used it myself while training clients. It’s become so ingrained that I heard someone interviewed on the radio the other day begin their answer with “My key message is . . .”

I still believe that, in times of crisis, sticking to a tight script is the wiser course. Reporters are always more interested in conflict that conciliation and a slip of the tongue that fans the flames is great news. Never let the facts interfere with a good story, is a long time reporter credo.

The question, I suppose, is whether we have gone too far in suggesting that every answer be pre-conceived and vetted by the executive committee. I still tell my clients to think about what they want to say before an interview and often that means engaging in a tug of wits with the reporter. But I also suggest they respond to questions before introducing the key message. That doesn’t mean blindly following the reporter’s agenda as to where the story is going. An interview should be a dialogue and you have as much right to set its course as the reporter.

The mistake most people make is that rather than respond to a question they set out to exhaustively answer it. That leads to follow up questions and then suddenly the interview is over and you haven’t had a chance to state what’s on your mind. When the story comes out, it doesn’t accurately represent your point of view.

Reporters, to some extent, have brought key messaging on themselves by not trying harder to capsulate the views of the people they interview. It’s easier (and makes a better story) when you have one person in favour of something and another person opposed to it. Subtleties and nuances make a story more difficult to tell so many journalists default to “he said, she said” reporting.

On the other hand, it’s easier and safer to memorize a key message than debate with someone who ultimately decides which parts of your story make it to air or to print. Maybe it’s time we step up our game and move media training from key messaging to persuasive dialogue.


1 Comment

Filed under Communication, Media, Messaging

One response to “Does Media Training Need a Face Lift?

  1. I’ve always said that no interview should consist merely of a recitation of key messages. A truly confident and effective spokesperson is far more like a superlative customer service person than a stone-walling robot. They know their stuff – and they know how their ‘stuff’ will be perceived. They have a natural gift for putting things in perspective and are keenly aware of the need to do so. I saw a really charming interview on the Lang & O’Leary report with the CEO of Highliner recently. While you could ID his key messages, you also had to admire the aplomb with which he discussed areas of the company’s performance where he freely admitted it needed improvement. Balance that with an effortlessly demonstrated broad knowledge of the industry, and that interview was a win:win:win – for Highliner, for the show, and for the general public. And I say that as someone in the ‘not a fan of fishsticks’ camp.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s